Sam Fraser
08-04-2009, 09:48 AM
Planet Earth has entered the age of the Personal Satellite with the introduction of Interorbital’s TubeSat Personal Satellite (PS) Kit.
Since the TubeSats are placed into self-decaying orbits 310 kilometers (192 miles) above the Earth’s surface, they do not contribute to any long-term build-up of orbital debris. After a few weeks of operation, they will safely re-enter the atmosphere and burn-up.
TubeSats are also available as Double TubeSats, Triple TubeSats, or Quadruple TubeSats. The length, volume, and mass of these expanded TubeSats are based on the multiplying factor.
http://spacefellowship.com/2009/08/01/interorbital-syatems-tubesat-personal-satellite-kit/
Can we cobble together for two weeks of NEO observation and spectroanalysis? Or is there little to be gained from sending a telescope above Earth's atmosphere? I know it blocks most infra-red, which is why IRAS was launched way back in 1983, but maybe that's not relevant. What opportunities now present themselves with this new micro-sat launch option?
Since the TubeSats are placed into self-decaying orbits 310 kilometers (192 miles) above the Earth’s surface, they do not contribute to any long-term build-up of orbital debris. After a few weeks of operation, they will safely re-enter the atmosphere and burn-up.
TubeSats are also available as Double TubeSats, Triple TubeSats, or Quadruple TubeSats. The length, volume, and mass of these expanded TubeSats are based on the multiplying factor.
http://spacefellowship.com/2009/08/01/interorbital-syatems-tubesat-personal-satellite-kit/
Can we cobble together for two weeks of NEO observation and spectroanalysis? Or is there little to be gained from sending a telescope above Earth's atmosphere? I know it blocks most infra-red, which is why IRAS was launched way back in 1983, but maybe that's not relevant. What opportunities now present themselves with this new micro-sat launch option?